Page 31 - Cyber Terrorism and Extremism as Threat to Critical Infrastructure Protection
P. 31

DENIS ČALETA, SARA PERKOVIĆ:  EXTREMISM AND RADICALIZATION IN THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT – SECURITY CHALLENGES
                              OF RETURN FOREIGN FIGHTERS

            extremists to reflect on their position. Using image and audio-based material on social media
            sites is particularly effective when communicating positive messages. Moreover, grass-roots
            initiatives which open up a dialogue between experts and society allow people to feel engaged
            and respected, while also producing valuable insight and rich discussion. Developing person-
            al resilience can enable society to deal with the difficulties and adversaries it encounters, leav-
            ing people less susceptible to extremism. Supporting people through times of transition, via
            outreach programmes in schools, universities and local communities, can contribute towards
            healthy behaviours and develop more supportive and cohesive communities” (Manning and
            La Bau, 2015, p 13).

            Other than those mentioned above, one successful means of deradicalization can be commu-
            nication between newly-returned foreign fighters and people who have already undertaken de-
            radicalization before them. Communication with people who know exactly what the problems
            were may be one of the very best ways: “Each testimony highlighted the importance of these
            personal stories when delivering counter-narratives.” (Manning and La Bau, 2015, p 27).
            When we study terrorism, extremism and violent extremism we often focus heavily on tactics
            and strategy; yet we can learn a great deal if we look at the cognitive and emotional behaviour
            which underlines a particular set of beliefs (Ibid., p. 12) In the end, returning foreign fight-
            ers and those who have been deradicalized can be the ones who are of help in creating pro-
            grammes for other foreign fighters: “returning foreign fighters can contribute to intelligence
            capacities and help in designing better deradicalization programmes (Leduc, 2016, p 18).

            With regard to the Islamic State, one of the most successful ways of deradicalization can be to
            demonstrate how not all Islamic State studies and their theoretical teachings are in harmony
            with what they do. Equally, challenging their ideology can be of use. However, deradicaliza-
            tion must be directed towards an individual in order to be successful, and this may be the
            hardest thing to achieve. Depending on the individual success of each person can be tough for
            the programme in general, because it means that even if a certain programme succeeds with
            one person, it does not mean that it will be successful with others. There are so many factors
            on which the success of deradicalization programmes depends. Therefore, it is hard to believe
            that deradicalization, in ways of talking to and trying to change the beliefs of foreign fighters,
            can bring about a complete separation of individuals from the terrorist organization, and, of
            course, some people will not be able to be rehabilitated by any means. Deradicalization is not
            and cannot be a simple process, because governments may not have the resources necessary
            for the supervision and monitoring of large numbers of individuals all at once and for making
            sure that they have all been in programmes.

            2.5 Ways of Reintegration

            When discussing the return of FFs, rehabilitation and reintegration must be seen as a vital
            step. Today there is much more information on this subject than there was in the past, and this
            attitude is the best way for these programmes to be successful and achieve their purpose. Pro-
            grammes of deradicalization and reintegration have generally been avoided by the countries
            of the western world, so they were first developed in the East. “The first-generation deradical-
            ization programmes tailored to Islamist militants were designed and developed in response to
            the September 2001 terrorist attacks carried out by al Qaeda in the United States and the Oc-
            tober 2002 bombings by Jemaah Islamiyah in Indonesia. These experimental deradicalization
            programmes, part of soft counterterrorism strategies, were rolled out primarily in Middle East
            and Southeast Asia in countries like Saudi Arabia (Prevention, Rehabilitation and After Care

                                                                                     31
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36